The Key of Reflexivity :: Ethnography Anthropology Essays

The Key of Reflexivity What gives me the right to judge? As a studying anthropologist, what constitutes me the right to study â€Å"Others† and proclaim my perception of the â€Å"studied† is correct? Since the development of writing, authors have fell victim to their own misconceptions of a studied group or culture. Even I, right now as I type away at this keyboard am judging and studying the works of other authors. Whether I take a critical or a supportive view of the writings is obsolete, what matters is how my personal life experiences as a studying anthropologist can lead to legitimate findings. Is this possible? Authors may take their own personal hang-ups of society and implement them into their writings. An example would be an angry painter asked to sketch a picture of a happy family seated in front of him. Is the picture accurate if the final creation portrays the family hugging each other but not smiling? Without reflexivity the author/painter will not know why his creation turned out the way it did. Anthropologists are similar to painters. Mainly because their pictures are text drawn with pens, pencils, or keyboards. However, self- reflexivity provides an awareness that allows for personal reflection, aiding in the process of the understanding. It also emphasizes the point of theoretical and practical questioning changing the ethnographer’s view of themselves and their work. To understand how anthropologists can study a group of people successfully, we must first understand their rationale. Kondo states â€Å" I felt every effort necessary in order to blend in and avoid being unmasked as a foreigner.† (Pg., 76) As a foreigner she is admitting to being different than the people she is studying. However, by doing so she is conveying that psyche and thoughts are what separate people, not just their physical traits. I believe this will benefit Kondo in her studies. Realizing that her linguistic and cultural skills will help her to assimilate into the culture and study truly as a participant observer. A misconception may present itself while analyzing a case as diverse as Kondo’s. To conclude that a Japanese woman with American culture, can add perspective for both instances, would be immature. Rather, a Japanese woman with American culture can only provide a legitimate stance for a Japanese woman, raised in a American culture. Malinowski on the other hand feels as though studying every little detail will provide you with the necessary components for a good anthropologist to construct a sound and rational ethnography.

Self Ananlysis Test

Self Analysis Report Behaviour in Organizations Submitted by: Ajitha Katakam (PGP25249) I. WHAT ABOUT ME? A. Personality Insights 1. What’s My Basic Personality? Extraversion Agreeableness Conscientiousness Emotional Stability Openness to Experience 2. What my Jungian 16-type personality? (ISTJ etc. ) 3. Am I type — A? 4. How well do I handle Ambiguity? 5. How creative am I ? 7 11 8 10 10 INTP 105 (A-) 28 -5 Attach Value Filled Questionnaire 34 55 -3 B. Values and Attitude Insights 1. What do I value? 2. How involved am I in my job? 3. How satisfied am I with my job? 4. What are my attitudes towards workplace diversity? C.Motivation Insights 1. What motivates me? Growth needs Relatedness needs Existence needs 2. What are my dominant needs? Achievement Affiliation Autonomy Power 3. What rewards do I value most? 4. What is my view of the nature of people? 5. What are my course performance goals? 6. How confident am I in my abilities to succeed? 7. What’s my attitud e toward achievement? Fall Reward 8. How sensitive am I to equity differences? 9. What’s my job’s motivating potential? MPS 10. Do I want an enriched job? 3. 9 18 11 15 16 Attached 23 10 45 17 45 16. 3 14 16 14 D. Decision Making Insights 1. What’s my decision-making style? IntuitiveRational 2. Am I procrastinator? 3. How do my ethics rate? 18 Attach your results 34 35 Attach your results 89 E. Other 1. What’s my emotional intelligence score? 2. What time of day am I most productive 3. How good am I at personal planning? 4. Am I likely to become an entrepreneur? II. WORKING WITH OTHERS A. Communication Skills 1. What’s my face-to-face communication style? Dominant Dramatic Contentious Animated Impression Relaxed Attentive Open Friendly 2. How good are my listening skills? -1. 1 -0. 6 0 1 0. 2 -0. 4 -0. 4 -1. 2 -0. 5 42 B. Leadership and Team skills 1. What’s my leadership style? People Oriented Task Oriented 2.How charismatic am I? Managemen t of attention Management of meaning Management of trust Management of self Management of risk Management of feelings 3. Do I trust others? 4. Do others see me as trustworthy? 5. How good am I at disciplining others? 6. How good am I at building and leading a team? 12 16 15 13 14 12 4 53 17 81 31 Reward Coercive Legitimate 2. 2 1. 7 4 10 9 C. Power and Conflict Skills 1. How power-oriented am I? 2. What’s my preferred type of power? Expert Referent 3. How good am I at playing politics? 4. How well do I manage impressions? Self-promotion Ingratiation Exemplification Intimidation Supplication 5.What’s my preferred conflict-handling style? Competing Collaborating Avoiding Accommodating Compromising 6. What’s my negotiating style? 4. 5 4 74 1. 75 1. 25 1. 25 1 1 18 16 10 15 14 21 III. LIFE IN ORGANIZATIONS A. Organization Structure 1. What type of organization structure do I prefer? 2. How willing am I to delegate? 3. How good am I at giving performance feedback? St rengths Weaknesses 52 63 2 2 25 4. 86 24 31 67 67 139 3. 04 B. Careers 1. What’s the right organizational culture for me? 2. How committed am I to my organization? 3. Am I experiencing work/family conflict? 4. How motivated am I to manage? . Am I well-suited for a career as a global manager? C. Change and stress 1. How well do I respond to turbulent change? 2. How stressful is my life? 3. Am I burned out? FIRO-B Inclusion Expressed Wanted Total 2 1 3 Control 5 2 7 Affection 2 4 6 Total 9 7 16 SPIRO SUMMARY SHEET PARENT Nurturing Supportive OK Styles 8 Rescuing Not-OK Styles 9 Under-Developed OK Ego States Operating Effectiveness Quotient Dominant Style Backup Style 7 10 6 3 13 6 Prescriptive 13 Task Obsessive 10 Bohemian 5 Aggressive 8 Sulking Regulating Normative Problem Solving ADULT Creative Innovative CHILD Reactive AdaptiveConfronting Resilient ? 45 Rescuing Supportive ? 43 Prescriptive Normative 58 Problem Solving Task Obsessive 70 Innovative Bohemian ? 100 Confronting Aggressive ? 33 Sulking Resilient IV. SOME PERSONAL INFORMATION (a)Name: Ajitha Katakam Age : 23 Gender:Female (b)Education B. Tech (Metallurgy and Materials Science) (c) CGPA: 6. 91 (d) Annual Family Income: 5 lakhs (e) Work experience: 22 months Roll No. : PGP25249 What do I Value? What Rewards I value most? How do my ethics rate? How good am I at personal Planning? Personality: My Big Five scores indicate moderate scores on all the five factors.The Jungian type is INTP which suggests that I am socially cautious, enjoy problem solving and highly conceptual. My score of 105 on the type- A test shows that I am A- suggesting I have a few traits of type- A personality. I can tolerate ambiguity but I am not creative. My most important terminal values are Pride in accomplishment, lasting friendships and Happiness where as my most important Instrumental values are Truthfulness (honesty), Assertiveness and Education & intellectual pursuits. I have moderate job involvement, low job satisfa ction and am pessimistic to work place diversity.My motivation for growth, relatedness and existence are high and on the same level. My dominant need is for achievement and the least is for affiliation. I am flexible in my perception of others, have strong course performance goals and strong self-efficacy. I have a very low job motivating potential and moderate response to job enrichment. My score on procrastination is towards the lower side suggesting I do not postpone or delay often. Though my ethics in some areas are concurrent with the majority they differ in most areas. I have EQ close to strong Emotional Intelligence and am proactive.I am an intermediate person having no particular preference between morning and evening. I need improvement in personal planning. Working with others: My low scores on all communication styles suggest my lack of dominant style and moderate listening skills. My leadership style is people oriented, however task oriented leadership is also comparable . I am fairly charismatic. I have low trust in others but I am perceived as trustworthy. I have some deficiencies in disciplining others and I am in the second quartile relating to building and leading a team.I have a high Mach score and good political skills. My preferred types of power are expert, legitimate, referent and my preferred conflict handling style is competing. I do not use impression management techniques but have good negotiating style. Life in Organizations: I have no clear preference between mechanic and organic design. My delegation skills need substantial improvement and I have significant self perceived weakness. I have a slight preference for informal, humanistic, flexible and innovative cultures. I faced moderate work/family conflict.I am highly motivated to perform managerial functions but my potential for success as a global manager is slightly low. I have low susceptibility to stress induced illness. I am not comfortable with turbulent changes and need to re -evaluate my priorities to avoid burnout. FIRO and SPIRO: My FIRO scores indicate low expressed affection, inclusion and moderate control. In the wanted category, I scored moderately on affection and low in inclusion and control. SPIRO scores indicate I need to improve in parent and child states.

Textual Reading/ Literary Analysis on Dracula - 1720 Words

Kevin Vang Textual Reading/ Literary Analysis Audience: classmates who argues that â€Å"Dracula† is not a Gothic genre Purpose: to show them that â€Å"Dracula† is a perfectly good example of Gothic genre â€Å"Dracula† a novel by Bram Stoker, deals with vampire folklore, Christian beliefs, and mostly gothic elements. Gothic elements are tremendous in this novel as it is seen a lot throughout the novel. The components of classic gothic elements as seen in â€Å"Dracula† includes the setting of the novel, the tone, a villainous character, and the fact that there is a hero that is struggling against an inescapable fate. Bram Stoker uses gothic elements such as isolated settings, gloom and doom, and secret passages in Dracula in which portray it†¦show more content†¦Ã¢â‚¬Å"†¦for when I had seen the view I explored further; doors, doors, doors everywhere, and all locked and bolted. In no place save from the windows in the castle walls is there and available exit (pg.31).† Jonathan came hard with the truth knowing that he was a prisoner. However, doors, as stated above, are important in this specific scene. Whereas the castle itself is the mind brain of secrets, locked doors proves to be stronger as they are like forbidden to enter at all costs. Likewise, when it had said, â€Å"Doors, doors, doors everywhere, and all locked and bolted† can be a symbol of portals coming from another path by needing to have a key to open the portal. As well as representing the whole of Dracula of his past and image because doors can close and open. Because of the image of Dracula and him being a vampire, these doors in his castle are locked signifying that he wishes no one to know what his true identity really is. Therefore, in â€Å"Dracula,† secret passages represent the truth behind every close door, but because they are meant to be secretive, it also emphasizes the idea of Gothicism furthering the overall general idea of gothic. In the same way Bram St oker incorporate uses of gothic elements in â€Å"Dracula,† Charlotte Bronte’s â€Å"Jane Eyre† also uses gothic elements similar to â€Å"Dracula,† in which we have â€Å"Dracula†